[ On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 at 11:26:08 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tag locking change
>
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> >
> > I think the issue is some of us don't want 'cvs rtag' to "work" when the
> > intent is to tag the head of a branch, especially not with the new more
> > per-directory-only locking scheme
>
> Just to reemphasize, the per-directory locking scheme is not "new", it's
> what all versions of CVS prior to 1.11.1 used. The change to locking
> the entire tree in CVS 1.11.1 was a stop-gap fix for a serious bug that
> could cause data loss.
Yes, of course. Sorry about that -- I didn't mean to confuse 1.11.1
with older versions! :-)
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
