On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 03:14, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> The problem with the vendor branch is that it starts at version 1.1 of every
> file (1.1.1.1 really, but that's an internal detail). You cannot start
> a vendor branch somewhere halfway up your trunk, so vendor branching is
> useless for the case when someone takes some release of your code and
> becomes a patch; you then have to track their patches on a real branch,
> the methods that you describe.
cvs import -b (vendor branch id) allows you to branch off at a later
point.
(me, I'd like -b to accept a tagname. Maybe I should try to write a
patch....)
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anthill.echidna.id.au/~jenn/
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
