Larry Jones wrote:
> A bit of both, I suspect.
That's good to know.
In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they
hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see
what's portable back to the main line..
Some basic features ("cvs passwd", "cvs ls", etc.) should be easy to
backport. Others (ACLs, all the NT-specific stuff, etc.) may be a lot
more messy, and probably won't be solid enough to pass muster anyway (so
this long argument may be moot, for all you know..)
--
Shankar.
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
