I would like to vote for this feature too. CVS's support for bug tracking is poor to nonexistent and many people have commented on it and requested better support. Tags don't really do it.
Steve Buroff -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Terrence Enger Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:19 AM To: Andrew Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug tracking. At 14:37 2002-10-11 -0500, Andrew Johnson wrote: >J wrote: >> >> Yes, but what I would like is a uniqe commit number, whatever it may be, 578 >> for instance applied to all the files involved in that single commit. > >That's just not how CVS works, and it never will. Could you please tell us why think cvs will never have this feature? If you think it should never have this feature, I would like to hear about that, too. The feature would allow automatic recovery of some of the information which developers--including the developers of cvs itself--maintain manually in the files Changelog, so I do not see how it could be a *bad* thing to offer. > >However I believe Subversion uses this approach, go have a look at that. >If you're not willing to change the way you think/work to match the tool, >you'll have to change the tool instead. > >- Andrew >-- >"Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon > >_______________________________________________ >Info-cvs mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs >_______________________________________________ >Info-cvs mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs > > _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
