I agree, well unless someone tells me that the information is incorrect then num is good enough for parsing in my book.
Thanks Kaz, Ron On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:19, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 18 Jun 2003, Ronald Petty wrote: > > > But you can tell this information by just looking at num > > > > ex. > > > > 1.2.2.1 (means it branched at 1.2), however if you look at 1.2 it says > > branch 1.2.2.1 is a branch rooted at itself, which is the exact same > > information. > > I think that the RCS file format is more flexible than the constraints > that CVS imposes on it for its own purposes. RCS branching is more > flexible with the numbering, from what I can recall. > > _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
