Mark D. Baushke writes: > > Between now and the release of svn 1.0, I believe it is possible to > address a number of the perceived limitations of CVS, but we need to > determine how such changes fit into the overall way that CVS works > rather than just adding a series of hacks. > > If anyone has really thought out a series of changes to CVS that allow > for an evolution into a more useful system, they are encouraged to post > either on [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] about them.
My personal opinion is that CVS has gone about as it can go without completely redesigning and reimplementing it. In some ways, that is what subversion has tried to do. If they're successful, more power to them; I'll be switching along with everyone else. If not, we'll still be here. -Larry Jones That's one of the remarkable things about life. It's never so bad that it can't get worse. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
