On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:37:21PM -0500, Ross Patterson wrote: > But the good news is that it doesn't look like what you're trying to do is > all that hard with normal CVS. Instead of trying to "cvs import" each > release, try just checking the updated code in to CVS. Tag it where tags > make sense, branch it where branches make sense, etc.
I've already considered doing this, but I'll loose the original timestamp information of each file. Since there are some 'historical' versions of linux, it's cool to keep the date each file was last modified by its authors. Only import can do this (import -d). Regards, Rodolfo Lima _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
