Matthew Herrmann writes: > > I upgraded to 1.11.9 but this didn't solve the problem.
Sorry, I knew there were a number of fixes to that code and I was hoping that they would fix the problem. Now that I think about it a bit more, however, I don't think it's fixable. I don't think there's any way for CVS to intuit, in the general case, what a missing tag should mean. For example, if it's the end tag that is missing and there's more than one branch past the start tag, which branch should CVS follow? -Larry Jones Oh, now don't YOU start on me. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
