[ On Friday, December 19, 2003 at 21:00:46 (-0500), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS security audit?
>
> The objection is that CVS was never *designed*, or even *intended*, to
> be secure. An audit will affect my confidence not one whit -- it's
> sufficient to keep honest people honest, nothing more.
Indeed. I couldn't agree more.
Furthermore CVS was designed to use any sufficiently transparent remote
job execution protocol that could have a wrapper put around it such that
it works like rsh. What more could anyone ask for than to leave both
communications _and_ security to some other specialized tools?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs