[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) writes: >I strongly disagree about the checksum failure message. It indicates >a serious confusion about the state of the working file that the user >*must* investigate. It indicates that there were local changes to >the file that CVS doesn't know about and is in the process of >discarding.
If that's really true, the right thing must be to change CVS so it doesn't do that without prompting and/or saving a backup copy of the file. (I thought that checksum failure messages indicated a bug in the patch algorithm. I suppose they could be either that or strange changes to the local file that CVS didn't notice.) -- Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
