[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quibble time: *if* you run cvs on a network you're sure is secure and everybody on it can be absolutely trusted (to the point where you'd be perfectly comfortable giving the root password to anybody who had an actual need for it), pserver is usable. It serves to prevent mistakes.
I think that's still overstating the case. If you run CVS on a network where you can trust people enough that you're confortable running telnet or rlogin, then pserver is fine.
I'd agree. I'm not on the network/admin team at my place of employment, but I do admin cvs and other source code control utilities. EVERYONE here uses telnet,rlogin and rsh, so it didn't really make sense for me to tighten up the pserver (over ssh) connections.
-Larry Jones
It COULD'VE happened by accident! -- Calvin
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
