Derek Robert Price wrote: > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:43 PM > To: Conrad T. Pino > >I only have Visual C++ 6.0 and various Borland C/C++ compilers. > >How much flexibility do we have deviating away from Visual C++ 5? > > > Well, fact of the matter is, I only have VC++ 6.0 too, so > unless someone > who has VC++ 5.0 wants to help out, we'll have to drop > support for VC++ 5.0. I could probably dig up a copy of VC 5.0, but is it worth it? What's the reason behind using VC5 as the officially supported version?
-- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. (<http://www.leitch.com/>) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal (<http://www.cuj.com/experts>) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
