Derek Robert Price writes: > > If you still don't believe me, try it. I've used this previously to > replace a TRUNK with the source from a branch. It should work as well > for a branch to branch replacement.
Indeed. Now that I've got my head screwed on straight, I concur with Derek: a two-revision merge should do exactly the right thing. -Larry Jones My upbringing is filled with inconsistent messages. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
