On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:30:31AM -0700, Abhinandan Jain wrote: >Perhaps "bug" was too strong a term. My point is that the longstanding >behavior of CVS (several years and at least until 1.11.4) has been to >accept such legal variants of relative paths. I am not sure why this has >changed and whether the change is intentional or a side-effect of some >other mod to CVS. > >I have modified our scripts to work around this more restrictive >behavior. However I did want to highlight this issue for the benefit of >others who are more knowlegeable about the CVS internals.
I'd expect it will have come about as a side-effect of the recent security fixes that stop relative paths in general. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
