-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Mark D. Baushke" wrote: > > Of course, the point I was trying to make in that thread was that it is > > POSSIBLE to do the same thing without any of the patches to cvs being > > necessary. > > > Mark, > would cvs_acls[1] in the source tarball, or cvs_acls2[2] be more direct > pointers to what he wants, with out having to patch CVS? Yes. > [1] cvs-1.11.16/contrib/cvs_acls.in > [2][sorry only had the tarball from 1.11.16 available so I don't know if > cvs_acls2 has been merged later.] cvs-1.11.17/contrib/cvs_acls.in is the same file as the 1.11.16 version and this is also the same version as the cvs-1.12.9/contrib/cvs_acls.in version. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-03/msg00401.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=cvs_acls2&idxname=info-cvs&max=20&result=normal&sort=score Yes, those are good pointers. My recollection is that Peter Connolly was going to clean up a few more warnings in his version of cvs_acls2.in as well as provide an option to use an old-style CVSROOT/cvsacl file if it is found. When he does that, his version of the file will be committed to replace the older cvs_acls.in file. -- Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2v7L3x41pRYZE/gRAmDjAJ9oiitQ9rlT/f4J2TlLzlxM9M63JgCeKHED lPcfBY4WhyAYbGcuLg2hvpY= =G49J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
