How about using the cvs_acls script? This is very effective for me (Thanks a lot to the person who wrote it) in controlling access. I believe this is in the contrib section.
-Cheers, Yamuna -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Info-cvs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 45 Message: 3 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:07:56 +0200 From: Fabian Cenedese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: loosing branch when updating to a tag on the branch To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> This brings up a question I've had for quite a while: is >> there a way to "close" a branch? >The only thing I can think of offhand would be to mark the tip of the branch >as dead, by using 'cvs remove'. It won't prevent anyone from resurrecting >the branch, though. It defeats version control, but can't you remove all versions on the branch and then remove the branch tag itself? That is of course only if the branch was just for some work and the work is now in the trunk. bye Fabi _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
