I have made that, and nothing changed at all. Maybe I did not explain myself well.
A file with 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 revisions. Generate 1.6 tah contains code from 1.1, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.5, I mean to NOT include changes made in 1.3 revision Checking out last revision (1.5) and doing "cvs update -j 1.3 -j 1.5" that does nothing... What am I doing wrong? Thanks again Rolo > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes [in very long lines]: > > > > > Using i.e "cvs update -j <revision 1.6> -j <revision 1.3> > > file.c", we discard changes from 1.6 to 1.3. Then, commiting, we get > > revision 1.7 that is exactly the same as 1.3. Now, suppose I want to > > generate a new revision of "file.c" but containing code from 1.1 to 1.3 > > + 1.5 and 1.6 revision, because I realise that I don not want the > > changes made on revision 1.4 but still want all the changes made in 1.5 > > and 1.6. Doing the previous update, I lost 1.4 changes but also 1.5 and > > 1.6. So the idea is revert ONLY the changes that were made on 1.4. If > > the changes of 1.5 and 1.6 are small (or changes of 1.) it can be do it > > manually but this is not my case. > > > > Is there any way to do this in CVS? > > Of course, just merge those changes back in: > > cvs up -j1.4 -j1.6 file.c > > -Larry Jones > > These findings suggest a logical course of action. -- Calvin > _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
