marko wrote: > Hi Edwin, > > Maybe this is an obviously stupid suggestion but how about > in your second > > method instead of deleting, you rename it... Then rename it > back after you > > do the update? > OK, that would solve it, but yes, it doesn't really sound > like a perfect > solution, because I'd have to rename, update and rename > again... Strange!
Strange is in the eye of the beholder. To me, it seems very strange that you want to preserve a file, but not have it in CVS. Surely if it's that important it should be under version control? -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
