> But that's a different approach from what was suggested. The suggested > approach was a commitinfo script. Commitinfo runs *only* on the server. > > I'm not saying the suggested approach was the best, or even workable. I'm > just pointing out a potential problem with the suggestion.
Yes, yes, I know, I suggested the different approach (a dedicated test machine) in a previous mail, and saw this as another argument in favor. I should have been more clear. Maarten _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
