Todd Denniston writes: > > Assuming the "-t" was really "-r", this is the expected behavior...
No, it is not. Expected behavior is for CVS to remove files that are under its control that do not contain the specified tag, but the original message said that it removed "things not yet in cvs", which it should never do. And I'm reasonably certain that it doesn't, so the original poster must be mistaken or described it incorrectly. -Larry Jones Just when I thought this junk was beginning to make sense. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
