> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Paul Sander > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:01 AM > To: info-cvs@gnu.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics) > [snip] > I maintain that in the version control domain, add/delete are not a > suitable equivalent of a rename operation. The reason is because > there's more to it than linking together partial logs as Greg > claims. > There are also issues relating to branch management, like deciding > which RCS file version 1.2.1.3 comes from. > I agree with you. I think the result from an annotate would be completely different when using a "move" operation instead of traditional "mv-remove-add" operation.
> -- > Paul Sander | "To do two things at once is to do neither" > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Publilius Syrus, Roman philosopher, 100 B.C. > Alexandre _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
