Mark O'Brien wrote: > Is there any reason not to use the -n option to cvs when calling rlog? None that I can think of offhand.
> Is there a way to run rlog without getting the comment > entries in the output? Have a look at the rlog options (cvs --help rlog) - there are several options that suppress various parts of the output. -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
