[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) writes: > Sergei Organov writes: > > > > How is it different from update -A *without* copying anything on top of > > it? My experience is that update -A would perform regular merge of > > current changes into the head version. Am I missing something? > > You're missing the fact that copying an old file over top of the current > file will wipe out any subsequent changes that were merged into the > current file by the update.
Ah, sorry, I forgot it supposed to be "revert changes" operation, then definitely the correct way is to use -j trick. And copying files over CVS-managed files is almost always a wrong idea indeed, especially for newbies. -- Sergei. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
