Edwin, > While there is much to say for the concurrent versioning philosophy, > there are also many situations where it is not the optimal solution. > (As represented by the fact that every so often this list receives > question about how to exclusively lock a file using CVS).
Of course, you are right. (Really, I meant: Do I need concurrent access to sources or is it okay to only have exclusive access by locking?) Subversion, in the current version, does provide exclusive locking. And, doesn't CVSNT also do it? It might be worth and interesting to check out some comparisons. The following ones are those I found on the web: (Anyone knowing others?) General: - http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html - http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs.php CVSNT vs. CVS: - http://www.cvsnt.com/cvspro/compare.htm Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
