Ming Kin Lai writes: > > You seem to suggest that <value> can be a revision number on a branch, such > as 1.2.2.1. Well, as mentioned in my previous post, this doesn't work in > the sense that this new revision will appear on the trunk, not the branch > 1.2.2.
That's not correct. If you currently have 1.2.2.1 checked out, you can use ``cvs ci -r 1.2.2.14'' and your new revision will be committed to the branch, not the trunk. If you don't have some revision on the 1.2.2 branch checked out, you'll get a not up-to-date error. In no event will you get a new revision on the trunk. -Larry Jones You should see me when I lose in real life! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
