In this case, can the developers solve any conflicts between the HEAD and the branch they are checking in to, or will that always be up to the check-in person? The only way I see is: the developers do the merging up to the actual commit and then hand over the working space to the check-in person to check and commit - but isn't "handing over" a workspace violating some CVS principles?
Mark
CVS can still support this mode of working, if you use the cvs_acls script, allow only the administrator (or check-in person) to check into HEAD, and allow developers to freely check into any branches. - -- Jim Hyslop Dreampossible: Better software. Simply. http://www.dreampossible.ca Consulting * Mentoring * Training in C/C++ * OOD * SW Development & Practices * Version Management
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
