Thanks Spiro. I've tried to use "cvs -f update", but still noting was updated, no did the CVS Entries in another machine. Then, I started to create a new copy by "cvs co module", it got all new directoris, the only thing I could not undstand was there were to Entries, one is Entries and another is a new Entries.Log in the CVS directory (which I don't have the Entries.Log in my copy). Why the CVS server created another Entries.Log? Could this be a problem where other machine does not have Entries.Log (only Entries)? I've little bit lost by this situation.
Thank you. Jim > Hello Jim, > > * On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +1100 Jim wrote: > >> I added and committed a new directory to the CVS tree from my local work >> copy. I can see the new added directory in CVS Entries of my local copy >> and I can see the new added directory in CVS server. But when I did a >> "cvs update" from another machine, the new added directory did not come, >> noting was updated. What is this problem and now can I fix it? > > most probably, the -P option is used on that second machine. Make sure > it is not used (by issuing "cvs -f update ..."). > > Best regards, > Spiro. > > -- > Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ > http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > info-cvs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs > _______________________________________________ info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
