> > It and older versions have served us well for many years. It is > > in use here because commercial packages in past years trashed > > repositories. CVS has sustained no losses that were not > > human induced. This was not a criticism of CVS in the > > least. > > > > Do you mean a commercial package variant of CVS??? if so > which one, so it can > be avoided.
Absolutely not. The commercial packages that failed had no relationship whatsoever to CVS. In any event, keep in mind that these failures did occur some time in the 90's, so we aren't talking about anything recent. The point was more that CVS has been so stable there was no practical need to consider anything else. Kevin Bulgrien This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
