>>>>> On 08 Nov 2001 18:22:35 +0000, >>>>> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> 8. Summary ic> I think this is a good solution because: ic> - No new concepts are introduced, it is rather a clarification of ic> existing ones ic> - Backwards compatibility is preserved ic> - You get some nice cool features - sieving on public folders, having ic> different scripts for different folders - including your own sub ic> folders, different people can maintain different folders ic> - Shouldn't have any particular performance implications. What about all the stats looking for the script? Could that be a problem? If so, could a db be used as a Sieve script index, like the mailboxes.db? -- Amos
