Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Michael Sims wrote: >> Is the new version of reconstruct not able to rebuild the cyrus >> metadata files? Or am I missing something obvious? Any assistance >> would be very much appreciated... > > One of the assumptions that reconstruct is making (indeed, made in the > past, except it wasn't treating sub-mailboxes and the first mailbox > the same) is that if the mailbox is in the mailbox list, is has a > valid header file (or, presumably, you can get one from a backup). > > The old way often just blew away an existing cyrus.header file, which > is almost always the wrong thing to do. > > Obviously this broke the case where the cyrus.header file doesn't > exist, which I'm going to throw into bugzilla.
Thanks for the quick response and the explanation. Do you think it will be a problem if I continue to use the reconstruct binary from 2.1.14 until the bug is fixed, or should I revert my entire installation to 2.1.14? Thanks... ___________________________________________ Michael Sims Project Analyst - Information Technology Crye-Leike Realtors Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722 ___________________________________________
