AJ wrote:Tried that one, but it spits back a user unknown error, which is misleading,I *believe* this is a problem with Sendmail. AFAIR smmapd returns the correct code/response.
is this an error, should it report over quota?
Andrzej, is this correct?
Current *sendmail-8.13* implementation *does not* make "explanation strings" passed by cyrus-imap (smmapd) with TEMP or PERM replies available in sendmail.cf.
It is sendmail's implementation fault but it can be fixed in smmapd by making smmapd use differnt reply formats based on map name
* "cyrus" map -> preserve current behavoiur
* "cyrus-ib" (in band) map -> no TEMP/PERM replies
for ok user return OK:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for over quota user retunrn over-quota:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[It would require small fixes of sendmail.cf feayures too ]
[...]
-- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page http://anfi.homeunix.net/ [ PageRank 6 ] --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
