On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:31:40AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > >On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" > ><david.l...@digitalinsight.com> wrote: > >>I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing > >>INBOX.sub.folder1 > >>and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism > >> > >>if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could they > >>remove > >>it without affecting INBOX.sub.folder? > > > >No, not easily. It would delete the whole tree by default. > > No, "RENAME" will affect to whole tree, but "DELETE" is not.
Yes, you're right. Of course, delete is a rename now - but not up at the level where that happens. A lot of clients do convert a delete into a tree delete though (or a rename under Trash in some cases) Bron. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
