>>>>> "HQ" == Hadron Quark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmmm. Well, it's a pity that the documentation does represent the >> state of development. Would be easier if I hadn't expected it to >> work. >> >> Phil HQ> Well, on the Linux side of things its often very hard to get HQ> people to admit that things don't work : its like insulting HQ> their children's intelligence or something. I spent ages messing HQ> around trying to get smtpmail working with gmail - not one HQ> person said "it doesn't work". When I got the CVS version, HQ> voila, it all "just worked". A moral there : if in doubt, try HQ> CVS first. I am using the CVS version (of emacs). Maybe not the most recent version though. Will try and update sometime soon. Still, once I'd trade the error it was fairly clear from the code that it was going to be windows specific. Personally, I always document where I have tested code, and where I know it to be working. Perhaps no one ever reads the documentation. Am I weird this way? Phil _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
