[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Ah, I forgot that case. One could say (if (boundp > 'nnmail-split-methods) nnmail-split-methods "unbound") instead of just > nnmail-split-methods in the statement.
That makes sense. If I had taken more time, I might have come up with that and tried it. > How come you don't see anything? Weird. Does it help to use sit-for > instead of sleep-for? Does it help to say (redraw-display) before > (sleep-for 3) or (sit-for 3)? > > Ick. I should be testing this. I didn't take the time to test it today, but I can say that, once I erased my .gnus.elc, I did see the display in the minibuffer for the statements in .gnus. >> Afterwards, (mapcar 'car load-history) gives a list that's not too >> meaningful: [...] given that it's truncated. > > I just tried it, and M-x ielm RET doesn't truncate. Ah. Thanks. Both C-j and C-e do from *scratch*. > I'm happy that it works now. Apologies for the clumsy help. NP. That was just what I needed to solve the problem, and I learned a few things along the way. Thanks! MfG, Bill -- Bill Harris http://facilitatedsystems.com/weblog/ Facilitated Systems Everett, WA 98208 USA http://facilitatedsystems.com/ phone: +1 425 337-5541 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
