[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote: > >> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I >> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement: their >> headers and training files are identical. So I think the proper >> approach is to use mailreaver if it exists on the system, or >> mailfilter if it doesn't. > > Does that mean that setting spam-crm114-program to point to > mailreaver.crm instead of mailfilter.crm is sufficient?
If I remember correctly, training for mailreaver is a little bit different, hence you cannot just replace mailfilter with mailreaver. Additionally, mailreaver caches the original message so that it is sufficient to train with the value of the X-CRM114-CacheID header. This is pretty useful since you don't have worry if the mail was somehow altered after it was scanned by CRM114. I wrote a little training function for mailreaver a while ago, but independent of spam.el: http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/GnusMailreaver -David _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
