Katsumi Yamaoka <[email protected]> writes: > Although I don't feel like very much making `reply', `wide-reply', > `very-wide-reply', `reply-with-original', `reply-broken-reply-to', > `mail-forward', `followup',... You don't have to. Now that I discovered C-d, I am in heaven.
The problem is when we went to gnus school, we only learned C-d was to be used for digests, E.g., RISKS DIGEST. Therefore, the documentation of C-d needs to promote it more, "the household knife that will be the last you need to buy, for so many tasks!" Furthermore, C-d indents, and even uses 1a. 3b. etc, instead of a flat: [1. text/plain] [2. message/rfc822] [3. text/plain] [4. text/plain] [5. message/rfc822] Therefore the above flat list needs to take a lesson from C-d, and though not indenting, still needs to reveal structure, by using 1a. 2c, etc. _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
