On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:37:49 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>> ..... it kind of almost makes sense.
> That's reassuring, almost.
Exactly.
(If you can't hear the tongue-in-cheek in that paragraph, you must be
needin' a hearing aid.)
>> Written many reference manuals, have you? :-)
> Surprisingly, I have, and I know garbage when I read it.
That's totally cool! Now you have two alternatives:
* Bitch and moan, yielding at best overbearing replies, at worst
sarcastic and unconstructively sullen replies (those would be mine).
* Find out what the manual should have said, and contribute it.
And since you have a) a lot of experience, and b) know how to
differentiate between garbage and good, you are the perfect person to
start fixing this problem you've come upon.
Get crackin'!
> That paragraph is absurd.
And what makes you think that wasn't intentional?
> It reads like it was written by someone in la-la land and conveys no
> useable information.
I'm sure the author of said paragraph will be happy to give you a full
refund :-)
Best regards,
Adam
--
"We get our thursdays from a banana." Adam Sjøgren
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
