On 20 Jun 2006 22:33:53 -0700,
"harry meyers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov schrieb:
>> 1) I think your fancy split rules are wrong. They look like simple
>> split rules. Look at the nnimap-split-fancy docs.
>> 2) gnus-spam-process-destination doesn't affect splitting, it matters
>> when you exit a group and you have articles in it that are marked as
>> spam. They will be processed by the spam backends and then sent to
>> the spam-process-destination ("SPAM" for all groups in your setup).
>> There's a similar process for non-spam (ham) articles.
>> Hope this helps Ted
> Yes, thans, that helped. As spam splitting with bogofilter requires
> fancy split rules I changed that in my gnus but did not change the
> other splitting rules to fancy split rules. Now I did this, everything
> works properly. harry
Can someone please show a working example of `nnimap-split-fancy' with
`spam-split' using bogofilter? I have:
---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->---
(require 'spam)
(setq spam-split-group "SPAM"
spam-use-bogofilter t
nnimap-split-inbox '("INBOX")
nnimap-split-predicate "UNSEEN"
nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
nnimap-split-fancy
'(| (from ".*sebmags.homelinux.org.*" "System")
(: spam-split)
"INBOX"))
(spam-initialize)
---<--------------------cut here---------------end--------------------->---
but invariably all messages in INBOX are obliterated completely from the
IMAP server. Any help would be very much appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Seb
_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
