Rud1ger Sch1erz <[email protected]> writes: > Leonidas Tsampros <[email protected]> writes: > >> I have never faced the problem described in the subject again. Generally >> doing a followup and yank (F) or wide reply and yank (S W) works for all >> of the other mailing lists and groups I'm subscribed to. > > I experience the same problem as you. I wonder why nobody else is > complaining. This list seems not to set the reply-to header to > [email protected]. So there is just the from-address of the > author. Thus followup or reply just uses the address of the author > instead of [email protected]. > > I fixed this for me using the posting styles. > > As I check for a couple of different email ids, I've defined this > function to determine to-from context:
Hi all I found a small undocumented problem in how Gnus removes address that it should not followup too. The offending function is 'rmail-dont-reply-to' and the value of the variable 'rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names'. It's default value was set to "\\`info-" and thus this group's To: address matched and it was pruned. Setting 'rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names' to nil will get your followups to work as expected! Googling with this variable, rendered a thread in this same list a year ago http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07008.html stating exactly the same thing as I do now. It took me a while too to figure this out. Anyway, I hope this helps :) By the way, I still do not understand why other people in this Group have not complained. Maybe they are are reading it with nntp. But again only 3 people in total use the mailing list? I'm inclined to think that this is a Gnus initiation process of some sort. <snip> _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
