[email protected] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: >> To me, it sounds like all Gcc'd messages will be >> marked as read. But even so, people very seldom use >> the Gcc header anyway - or so it would seem. > > Really? I Gcc: all my emails and articles. That is > how Gnus archives outgoing messages...
Yes, I do that as well. And I can live with those being marked as read, if that's what happens with the option you provided. Though, optimally, I would like them to be *not* read (always shown) in my *archive* group, and *never* shown in the group(s) you send them to. With the rare exception when you post a question, and then find the answer yourself - then, I like to quote myself, and provide the answer. I guess that's a bit "stöddigt" but it is beneficial to people who might Google the same problem, and perhaps others who follow the group and might be interested in general... No - I meant, reading the docstring of the option you suggested, it looked like all the stuff you get by means of Gcc gets marked as read. And people might use it to send things to you, right? But *that* never happens to me - I don't think I ever got a single mail that way. So perhaps it is OK just the same. > But it may very well only be the archived copy that > is automatically marked as read. Post if you find out. I'll do the same. > I am so use to how it Just Works, that it feels > natural to me. Maybe I am just vain, and like to read > my own emails and articles :-) Yeah, that might be vanity, but it is also natural because you are so familiar with the stream of thoughts, it is like listening to a song you know inside-out. Most often I read old messages that describes something, and I know I once knew that, only now, it foggy at best... -- underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
