Carlos Pita <carlosjosep...@gmail.com> writes: > Then you can just say that the summary buffer isn't > immediately refreshed, which doesn't feel so bad and > is easier to understand and live with.
The summary buffer isn't refreshed automatically if it is open and then you do something in the group buffer that should show in the summary buffer. That's just a general observation. If you don't have a summary buffer, and it shows up, but the marks are inconsistent, then that is either a misunderstanding, a misconfiguration, or a bug - or a combination :) The rule of bug reports is, though, that if you think or suspect it is a bug, you should report it! Sometimes it isn't a bug, but that's OK. > I've reported this as a bug a number of days ago, and > I would like to add the above remark as a followup or > commentary to the report, but I'm not able to find > instructions on how to do that. Good question. There are bug tracking systems where you can provide additional information - as in, the bug is a Usenet thread itself, somewhat - but I don't know what Gnus uses. Since the discussion on gnu.emacs.gnus is ultra-on-topic (which is great), I assume that the developers read every single line, so I don't think you have to worry that this post of yours is lost to them. -- underground experts united _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
