Le 07/11/14 à 10h09, Damien Wyart <[email protected]> a écrit : > * Denis Bitouzé <[email protected]> in gnu.emacs.gnus: >> What do you mean by "Gnus" groups? Newsgroups, as provided by gmane >> for instance? > > No, the notion of group in Gnus also applies to email messages. It is > just a container of messages, either stored locally or accessed through > IMAP for mails, or read via NNTP for News (the Agent also plays a role > by caching locally, but let's keep things simple :).
Okay. That's a feature I like very much, and that I'd like to apply also for current actions, e.g. to have a single keybinding for replying, be it to a email or to news articles. > If you use Gnus to read email, you use mail groups, even if you do not > know it :). With that definition of groups, I already knew that :) > See for example: > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Splitting-Mail.html > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Choosing-a-Mail-Back-End.html > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Using-IMAP.html > >> > I think the simplest solution is to play with the corresponding group >> > parameter to-address (and broken-reply-to if needed). See: >> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnus/Group-Parameters.html > >> Unfortunately, some of the lists I'm subscribed to don't have any >> newsgroup counterpart. > > How do you read them? In my main INBOX group (gmail IMPA). > If each list doesn't have its own group, you might need to configure > splitting. Having a group per list is very convenient. I guess so. I'll have a look at splitting mail. >> A further check of the list's headers puzzled me: `Reply-To:` is the >> list address, not the sender's one. Why Gnus doesn't take it into >> account when I reply with `r` or `F`? > > r is explicitely to reply to the author. Sigh... But, on the gnus refcard, I can see: ┌──── │ S r (r) Mail a reply to the author of this article. │ [...] │ S B r Like S r but ignore the Reply-To: header. └──── so `r` shouldn't ignore the Reply-To: header. > Mail-Followup-To is stronger: > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/message/Mailing-Lists.html Okay. > This discussion might also be interesting: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/fr.comp.applications.emacs/gnus$20reply-to/fr.comp.applications.emacs/gkgqR88EJc8/Rf00vPL4__8J Indeed. One of the contributor of this thread (in French) strongly disagrees with the Reply-To: header but I must admit I don't see what's his point. -- Denis _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
