Elias Mårtenson <[email protected]> writes: > I disagree. Sometimes you are working in an > organisation where Outlook is the main means of > communication. If so, you need to (unfortunately) > post messages that conforms to this style. > This includes including the entire email chain below > your message, as well as your own messages being > HTML formatted.
That never happened to me, and God willing it never will. I see it even left you post-traumatized because you don't quote like us but instead answer hanging in the air and then leave the replied-to post in its entirety below you post. Also, it doesn't matter if anyone uses Outlook or Gnus or any other client for that matter. Well, of course it matters in the sense that those with style and precision use Gnus. But it doesn't matter how quoting should be done, how the signature should be done (below a double dash and a space, i.e. "-- " as described in section 4.3 of [1]), and so on. Mails are interface agnostic - or should be. > because Emacs does not have a HTML parser so I need > to call out to an external program for that. I'll be > happy to provide advice for anyone that wants to try > it though. Emacs have several web browsers - for example the high-quality piece of software Emacs w3m. Emacs w3m is in the Debian repositories but isn't shipped with Emacs. But Emacs comes with eww which should be good but with many less man-hours put into it compared to the mature Emacs w3m. Anyway I don't see how any of this would work without (probably several) HTML parsers? [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.txt -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
