Some entity, AKA [email protected] (Adam Sjøgren), wrote this mindboggling stuff: (selectively-snipped-or-not-p)
> B.V. writes: > >> How about trying "^\\[git/adm\\].*" vs "^Re: \\[git/adm\\].*" >> I have myself not tried it. But I think the regexp should work! > > Adding the ^ doesn't work, but your suggestion gave me the idea of > having something that matches "Re: [git/adm]" first, and then the usual > rule after. That works. Although it feels a little kludgey. It the way the mail-splitting works, sequential and when it hits on the first matchting reg-expr it drops the message in the box and then goes to the next incoming message. Sometimes it really looks like doing magic to get the filtering the way you want. Cor -- Geavanceerde politieke correctheid is niet te onderscheiden van sarcasme _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
