Sebastian Christ <[email protected]> writes: > The first number is the the score for this thread. My assumption was > that the threads scored with 10 and 20 would be listed before the > threads scored with 9. Is my assumption false? Or did I miss some > configuration?
Awhile back I noticed something similar, where the order of threads was inconsistent with their score. My configuration is somewhat different from yours, but perhaps it's the same root cause. What I discovered was that the set of messages that were used to calculate the thread score was different from the set of messages that were grouped together for display. The first set seemed to be determined by header lines (probably some combination of References and In-Reply-To). The second set seemed to be determined by a shared subject. HTH, mike _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
