Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email protected]> writes: > To score on "Subject" you have to use subject > scoring, not extra scoring. I think. [...] Oh, and > the Subject, too. :-)
Aha, now I see what you mean. Yes, I added that thinking perhaps the "extra" would work on a less radical header than X-Spam-Flag. But that wasn't the issue. I understand that if you want to do stuff on Subject, you should use the built-in way which is optimized and/or has specific options. I take it the whole "extra" stuff is so not every header has to be examined. >> Result: "[ (](X-Spam-Flag \\. >> \"\\([^\"]*\\\\\"\\)*[^\"]*YES\\([^\"]*\\\\\"\\)*[^\"]*\")[ >> )]" >> Result: re-search-forward >> Result: re-search-forward >> Result: 101 (#o145, #x65, ?e) >> Result: nil > > What's in the scoring buffer at this point? It looks > like it's this search that's failing... If you mean the *Score Trace*, then "No score rules apply to the current article (default score 0)." -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
