Emanuel Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Andrzej A. Filip" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Do you use flyspell? It may deliver what you want in
>> another way.
>
> Ispell is better. Write, then spell, then send. Do it
> all at once you loose your mindfulness and the result
> will suffer. Flyspell sounds good but in practice too
> many words that should be there aren't, which means
> correct words will pop up as incorrect or unknown all
> the time while typing. This is when the brain should
> not focus on spelling but on conveying a message from
> one person to another. The fingers should do the
> spelling and in time they will. For the occasional
> mistake spellcheck just before send is a much
> better idea.

My opinion is quite different but I sure you are the expert in judging
what is the best for YOU :-) .  I am sure flyspell is a thing worth to
_try_ .  I am quite sure it will not be the best choice _for everyone_ .

After a few months+ of flyspelling I get bad spelling marks hardly ever.

_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english

Reply via email to