Dave Abrahams <d...@boostpro.com> writes: > > Yes. Other things that work really well in a setup like that are: > > 1. Using dovecot's mdbox storage format, which is much more efficient > > 2. Building dovecot with clucene and stemmer support for search > > 3. Using mbsync from the isync project (scales much better than > offlineimap IMO,
I saw this too. mbsync (AKA isync) was ~30 times faster in my tests. It was also important to build from the git repo because, at least a month or two ago, the tar.gz at version 1.2.1 was missing a feature that turns out to be important in my gmail sync setup. Built from the git repo it shows this version info: g1@g1 ~$ mbsync --version isync 1.3.0 > though I am about to try dropping it because doveadm sync is already > part of dovecot) A couple months ago I put a fair amount of effort into trying to use dovecot sync. I ended up concluding that mbsync is faster and easier to config. _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
