On Tue, May 19 2020, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen <[email protected]> writes: > >>> The obvious goal is to get a better overview of what is marked before I >>> e.g. delete the articles. It's too easy to make a mistake with only >>> those little # marks around. Ideally the used face would specify a >>> background color (like hl-line) so it doesn't interfere with the stuff >>> in `gnus-summary-highlight'. >> >> I haven't ever looked at the summary-highlight code, but would it be >> hard to add another entry in there, call it `process', to specifically >> target the process mark? > > I don't think that's necessary? Can't you just add highlighting based > on pretty much anything in the highlighting code? (It's been a while > since I looked at it...)
I found this old thread. Could it make sense to have a minor mode that puts the `invisible' text property on all lines without process-mark? I have in mind a use case different from Michael who started this thread: Often I deal with threads that evolve (magically) such that they become recognized as multiple threads. In such a case the process-mark can help to "collect" all threads on a topic. Or are there better solutions for this? _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
