Roland Winkler <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, May 19 2020, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Eric Abrahamsen <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> The obvious goal is to get a better overview of what is marked before I >>>> e.g. delete the articles. It's too easy to make a mistake with only >>>> those little # marks around. Ideally the used face would specify a >>>> background color (like hl-line) so it doesn't interfere with the stuff >>>> in `gnus-summary-highlight'. >>> >>> I haven't ever looked at the summary-highlight code, but would it be >>> hard to add another entry in there, call it `process', to specifically >>> target the process mark? >> >> I don't think that's necessary? Can't you just add highlighting based >> on pretty much anything in the highlighting code? (It's been a while >> since I looked at it...) > > I found this old thread. Could it make sense to have a minor mode that > puts the `invisible' text property on all lines without process-mark?
I'm cc'd here but don't know this area of the code at all, sorry. > I have in mind a use case different from Michael who started this thread: > > Often I deal with threads that evolve (magically) such that they become > recognized as multiple threads. In such a case the process-mark can > help to "collect" all threads on a topic. Or are there better solutions > for this? I think `gnus-summary-reparent-thread' or some subset of the code therein might provide a solution. _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
